Superior Court Issues Significant Decision Regarding Construction Managers

The Worcester Superior Court recently issued an important decision that could significantly affect the risk assumed by construction managers performing public projects under the M.G.L. c. 149A construction manager – at risk delivery method.

In Coghlin Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Gilbane Building Company, an electrical subcontractor filed suit against the construction manager seeking millions of dollars in extra costs allegedly resulting from project mismanagement.  The construction manager, in turn, asserted third-party claims against the owner arguing that the subcontractor’s additional costs were caused by design errors.  The owner moved to dismiss the third-party claims on the grounds that the construction manager was contractually obligated to defend and indemnify the owner against such claims.

The Superior Court allowed the owner’s motion to dismiss, noting that the construction manager undertook additional duties beyond those typically assumed by a general contractor in the traditional design-bid-build delivery method.  The Court referred to language in the construction management contract placing “extensive” design review responsibilities on the construction manager, including the obligation to “review, on a continuous basis, development of Drawings, Specifications, and other design documents.”  The Court held that this language trumped the long-standing “Spearin doctrine” which provides that the owner impliedly warrants the sufficiency of plans and specifications to its contractor.

This decision raises the possibility that construction managers on state and municipal projects may be held as guarantors of design specifications, with all of the attendant legal ramifications.  This decision has been appealed.  Check in with On Solid Ground for updates.

About David Fine

David is an partner in the firm's Litigation Group and is chair of the Construction Law Group. David serves as litigation counsel for contractors, subcontractors, suppliers and other business concerns within the construction industry. He regularly advises his clients on matters such as contract drafting and dispute resolution, surety bond claims, mechanics liens and bid protests. David works closely with a number of local and regional trade organizations, and he often lectures and writes about topics pertinent to the construction industry.
This entry was posted in Construction and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Superior Court Issues Significant Decision Regarding Construction Managers

  1. Charles H. Davis II says:

    thank you. charles h. davis ii the davis group client of david mccay.——————————————–

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s