Appeals Court Ruling is Warning Not to Interfere with Deeded Easement Rights

Corporate ParkThe Appeals Court’s ruling yesterday in Martin v. Simmons Properties, LLC emphasizes that property owners act at their peril when they infringe upon deeded easement rights.  In this case, Clifford Martin owned property in an industrial/commercial subdivision on the Medford-Somerville line.  Martin’s interior lot had no frontage on a public way, but it had the benefit of access to rights of way in the subdivision.  Martin filed suit in the Land Court in 2007 alleging that Simmons, the owner of the adjacent property where Martin’s right of way was located, interfered with his easement rights by placing encroachments in, parking on and improperly filling the way.  Martin sought a court order requiring Simmons to remove the encroachments and restore the way. 

Although Simmons prevailed at the Land Court, its victory was short lived.  The Appeals Court reversed significant portions of the Land Court’s decision.  Most importantly, the Appeals Court ruled that Simmons must remove many of the encroachments, including a below-grade entryway to Simmons’ building and a loading dock.  The Appeals Court remanded back to the Land Court the question of whether Simmons must remove landscaping and curbing that interferes with the way, or whether Martin bears the onus of performing that work. 

The lesson from the Martin case:  think twice before obstructing or interfering with the rights of an easement holder, even if the easement holder is not using that part of the way, and even if the obstruction is only a partial one.  While this guidance does not bar, for example, temporarily parking vehicles on the easement provided they do not substantially obstruct the way, “permanent structures or objects which impede passage, unless truly de minimis, are inconsistent with a right of passage.” 

For more information on easements and protecting easement rights, please contact Dave McCay at Mirick O’Connell at (508) 791-8500.

About David McCay

Dave is a partner in the firm’s litigation and land use groups where he assists clients in the resolution of complex real estate, environmental and business disputes. He also represents property owners and developers in local land use permitting matters. Dave is active in the Boroughs+ region serving as the Chair of the Southborough Economic Development Committee and as immediate Past Chair of the Marlborough Regional Chamber of Commerce. He is also a member of the Board of Directors of the 495/MetroWest Partnership, the Advisory Board of the MetroWest Economic Research Center at Framingham State University, and the Marlborough Economic Development Corporation. Dave lives in Southborough with his wife and two sons.
This entry was posted in Easements, Title and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Appeals Court Ruling is Warning Not to Interfere with Deeded Easement Rights

  1. Great blog, good consumer content ,one can get lot of knowledge from this article, This is very helpful information.its honor to visit your blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s